[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1110155: marked as done (unblock: openjdk-21/21.0.8+9-1)



Your message dated Wed, 30 Jul 2025 21:53:48 +0000
with message-id <E1uhEk8-003h0t-1g@respighi.debian.org>
and subject line unblock openjdk-21
has caused the Debian Bug report #1110155,
regarding unblock: openjdk-21/21.0.8+9-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1110155: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1110155
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: openjdk-21@packages.debian.org, security@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:openjdk-21
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package openjdk-21

openjdk-21 is one of the packages where we are following
an upstream branch for security fixes.

The attached debdiff only covers debian/

"Test in progress" in the britney output is due to the package
being in the REJECT list on these architectures.

unblock openjdk-21/21.0.8+9-1
diff -Nru openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/changelog openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/changelog
--- openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/changelog	2025-04-24 02:57:46.000000000 +0300
+++ openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/changelog	2025-07-17 15:34:13.000000000 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
+openjdk-21 (21.0.8+9-1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * OpenJDK 21.0.8 release, build 9.
+    - Addresses CVE-2025-5010, CVE-2025-50059, CVE-2025-30754, CVE-2025-30749.
+
+  [ Vladimir Petko ]
+  * d/p/jdk-8359735-proposed.patch: Fix process tests failing in Ubuntu 25.10.
+
+ -- Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>  Thu, 17 Jul 2025 16:12:28 +0200
+
+openjdk-21 (21.0.8~5ea-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * OpenJDK 21.0.8 early access, build 5.
+
+ -- Matthias Klose <doko@ubuntu.com>  Tue, 03 Jun 2025 13:05:25 +0200
+
 openjdk-21 (21.0.7+6-1) unstable; urgency=high
 
   * OpenJDK 21.0.7 release, build 6.
diff -Nru openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/patches/jdk-8334895-proposed.patch openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/patches/jdk-8334895-proposed.patch
--- openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/patches/jdk-8334895-proposed.patch	2024-08-08 09:25:10.000000000 +0300
+++ openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/patches/jdk-8334895-proposed.patch	1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-Description: set default compatible cds alignment to auto for arm64
- ARM64 requires cds alignment option to be enabled if CDS is enabled.
- Setting it to true will enable the option even if CDS is disabled
- causing a configuration error. Setting option to auto allows one to
- enable it only when CDS is enabled.
-Author: Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com>
-Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8334895
-Last-Update: 2024-06-25
-
---- a/make/autoconf/jdk-options.m4
-+++ b/make/autoconf/jdk-options.m4
-@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ AC_DEFUN_ONCE([JDKOPT_SETUP_JDK_OPTIONS]
-   # three different page sizes: 4K, 64K, and if run on Mac m1 hardware, 16K.
-   COMPATIBLE_CDS_ALIGNMENT_DEFAULT=false
-   if test "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_OS" = "xlinux" && test "x$OPENJDK_TARGET_CPU" = "xaarch64"; then
--    COMPATIBLE_CDS_ALIGNMENT_DEFAULT=true
-+    COMPATIBLE_CDS_ALIGNMENT_DEFAULT=auto
-   fi
-   AC_SUBST(COMPATIBLE_CDS_ALIGNMENT_DEFAULT)
- 
diff -Nru openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/patches/jdk-8359735.patch openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/patches/jdk-8359735.patch
--- openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/patches/jdk-8359735.patch	1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200
+++ openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/patches/jdk-8359735.patch	2025-07-17 15:32:27.000000000 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+Description: Process tests fail due to rust-coreutils
+ To accommodate systems like Ubuntu 25.10 that use Rust coreutils,
+ this PR updates tests that previously assumed busybox was the only
+ environment to use symlinks for core utilities.
+ - java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java: The test is updated to simply
+   verify that /bin/true and /bin/false are symlinks,
+   removing the hardcoded check for a /bin/busybox target.
+ - java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java: The test logic is relaxed.
+   It now confirms that /bin/sleep is a symlink and then uses the
+   symlink's target as the expected executable name.
+Author: Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com>
+Origin: upstream, https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/25838
+Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8359735
+Reviewed-by: Roger Riggs <roger.riggs@oracle.com>
+Last-Update: 2025-06-19
+---
+
+--- a/test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java
++++ b/test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessBuilder/Basic.java
+@@ -696,7 +696,7 @@
+         public static String path() { return path; }
+         private static final String path = path0();
+         private static String path0(){
+-            if (!Platform.isBusybox("/bin/true")) {
++            if (!Files.isSymbolicLink(Paths.get("/bin/true"))) {
+                 return "/bin/true";
+             } else {
+                 File trueExe = new File("true");
+@@ -711,7 +711,7 @@
+         public static String path() { return path; }
+         private static final String path = path0();
+         private static String path0(){
+-            if (!Platform.isBusybox("/bin/false")) {
++            if (!Files.isSymbolicLink(Paths.get("/bin/false"))) {
+                 return "/bin/false";
+             } else {
+                 File falseExe = new File("false");
+--- a/test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java
++++ b/test/jdk/java/lang/ProcessHandle/InfoTest.java
+@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
+ /*
+- * Copyright (c) 2014, 2023, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
++ * Copyright (c) 2014, 2025, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+  * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
+  *
+  * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+@@ -295,10 +295,12 @@
+                     String expected = "sleep";
+                     if (Platform.isWindows()) {
+                         expected = "sleep.exe";
+-                    } else if (Platform.isBusybox("/bin/sleep")) {
+-                        // With busybox sleep is just a sym link to busybox.
+-                        // The busbox executable is seen as ProcessHandle.Info command.
+-                        expected = "busybox";
++                    } else if (Files.isSymbolicLink(Paths.get("/bin/sleep"))) {
++                        // Busybox sleep is a symbolic link to /bin/busybox.
++                        // Rust coreutils sleep is a symbolic link to coreutils
++                        // The busbox/coreutils executables are seen as ProcessHandle.Info command.
++                        Path executable = Files.readSymbolicLink(Paths.get("/bin/sleep"));
++                        expected = executable.getFileName().toString();
+                     }
+                     Assert.assertTrue(command.endsWith(expected), "Command: expected: \'" +
+                             expected + "\', actual: " + command);
diff -Nru openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/patches/misalign-pointer-for-armhf.patch openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/patches/misalign-pointer-for-armhf.patch
--- openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/patches/misalign-pointer-for-armhf.patch	2024-03-21 00:00:09.000000000 +0200
+++ openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/patches/misalign-pointer-for-armhf.patch	2025-07-17 17:12:13.000000000 +0300
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  Add 1 to address type rather than aligned structure to produce misaligned pointer.
 --- a/test/hotspot/gtest/metaspace/test_is_metaspace_obj.cpp
 +++ b/test/hotspot/gtest/metaspace/test_is_metaspace_obj.cpp
-@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
+@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ public:
      ASSERT_TRUE(MetaspaceObj::is_valid(p));
  
      // A misaligned object shall not be recognized
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
      ASSERT_FALSE(MetaspaceObj::is_valid(p_misaligned));
  
      // Test VirtualSpaceList::contains
-@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
+@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ public:
      ASSERT_TRUE(vslist->contains((MetaWord*)p));
  
      // A misaligned pointer shall still be recognized by list::contains
@@ -20,4 +20,4 @@
 +    ASSERT_TRUE(vslist->contains((MetaWord*)((address)p + 1)));
  
      // Now for some bogus values
-     ASSERT_FALSE(MetaspaceObj::is_valid((MetaspaceObj*)NULL));
+     ASSERT_FALSE(MetaspaceObj::is_valid((MetaspaceObj*)nullptr));
diff -Nru openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/patches/series openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/patches/series
--- openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/patches/series	2025-01-17 09:51:04.000000000 +0200
+++ openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/patches/series	2025-07-17 15:32:18.000000000 +0300
@@ -42,10 +42,10 @@
 hsdis-fpic.patch
 jdk-8329983.patch
 jdk-8334502-proposed.patch
-jdk-8334895-proposed.patch
 jdk-8331541.patch
 jdk-8336529-proposed.patch
 jdk-8312488.patch
 # FIXME: which one of these two?
 zero-alpha-workaround.diff
 #jdk-8347014-proposed.patch
+jdk-8359735.patch
diff -Nru openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/patches/test-use-ip-address.patch openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/patches/test-use-ip-address.patch
--- openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/patches/test-use-ip-address.patch	2024-03-21 01:08:28.000000000 +0200
+++ openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/patches/test-use-ip-address.patch	2025-07-17 17:12:13.000000000 +0300
@@ -4,25 +4,14 @@
 Author: Vladimir Petko <vladimir.petko@canonical.com>
 Forwarded: not-needed
 Last-Update: 2023-03-27
---- a/test/jdk/java/net/InetAddress/IsReachableViaLoopbackTest.java
-+++ b/test/jdk/java/net/InetAddress/IsReachableViaLoopbackTest.java
-@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
-     public static void main(String[] args) {
-         try {
-             InetAddress addr = InetAddress.getByName("localhost");
--            InetAddress remoteAddr = InetAddress.getByName("bugs.openjdk.org");
-+            InetAddress remoteAddr = InetAddress.getByName("8.8.8.8");
-             if (!addr.isReachable(10000))
-                 throw new RuntimeException("Localhost should always be reachable");
-             NetworkInterface inf = NetworkInterface.getByInetAddress(addr);
 --- a/test/jdk/java/net/InetAddress/getOriginalHostName.java
 +++ b/test/jdk/java/net/InetAddress/getOriginalHostName.java
-@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
+@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ public class getOriginalHostName {
          SharedSecrets.getJavaNetInetAddressAccess();
  
      public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
 -        final String HOST = "dummyserver.java.net";
 +        final String HOST = "localhost";
          InetAddress ia = null;
-         ia = InetAddress.getByName(HOST);
-         testInetAddress(ia, HOST);
+         ia = getInetAddress(HOST);
+         if (ia != null) testInetAddress(ia, HOST);
diff -Nru openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/rules openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/rules
--- openjdk-21-21.0.7+6/debian/rules	2025-04-23 07:43:49.000000000 +0300
+++ openjdk-21-21.0.8+9/debian/rules	2025-07-17 17:12:28.000000000 +0300
@@ -2035,7 +2035,7 @@
 	dh_builddeb -a $(nodemo) $(nojrez) #$(bd_options)
 
 git_project		= jdk21u
-git_tag			= jdk-21.0.7+6
+git_tag			= jdk-21.0.8+9
 package_version		= $(shell echo $(PKGVERSION) | sed 's/-[^-][^-]*$$//')
 ifneq ($(is_upstream_release),yes)
   package_version	:= $(subst +,~,$(package_version))

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Unblocked openjdk-21.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: