[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1109462: marked as done (unblock: sbuild/0.89.4 [pre-approval])

Your message dated Sun, 20 Jul 2025 14:31:23 +0200
with message-id <a7fcc422-5dfe-41d0-8fd5-d117052b1238@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1109462: unblock: sbuild/0.89.4 [pre-approval]
has caused the Debian Bug report #1109462,
regarding unblock: sbuild/0.89.4 [pre-approval]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1109462: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1109462
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: sbuild@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:sbuild
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package sbuild

[ Reason ]

We want to downgrade the gnupg dependency, so gnupg becomes "more
optional" for DDs. Also fix two typos.

[ Impact ]

Not a big deal.

[ Tests ]

autopkgtests exist, and Jochen Sprickerhof verified the dependency 
change manually.

[ Risks ]

sbuild is a key infrastructure package for building packages. 
However on the buildd network the installed packages are managed and 
this should have no impact.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing

[ Other info ]

I assume during the trixie lifecycle updates to sbuild will be 
uploaded to trixie-backports and would contain these changes.

unblock sbuild/0.89.4

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 18-07-2025 13:24, Chris Hofstädtler wrote:

[ Reason ]

We want to downgrade the gnupg dependency, so gnupg becomes "more
optional" for DDs. Also fix two typos.

[ Impact ]

Not a big deal.



pfff, let's not do this anymore, nice forky material.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: