[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1103164: marked as done (unblock: ompl/1.6.0+ds1-3)

Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2025 08:54:25 +0000
with message-id <aHi6QbeRl-uSei8S@debian.org>
and subject line Re: release.debian.org: Fixing a policy violation
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103164,
regarding unblock: ompl/1.6.0+ds1-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1103164: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103164
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

The package ompl is of a library. There was a mistake in the name of the
package library assigning 16 (libompl16t64) when the ABI number was 17
It is a policy violation because the package should be libompl17.

The library package has no others packages that depend on it, so no
transition is necessary. I would like to ask for exception and let the
version in experimental to go to unstable.

Best regards

--
--
Linux User 152692     GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA
Catalonia
-------------------------------------
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On Mon, Apr 14, 2025 at 08:35:02PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
> The package ompl is of a library. There was a mistake in the name of the
> package library assigning 16 (libompl16t64) when the ABI number was 17
> It is a policy violation because the package should be libompl17.
> 
> The library package has no others packages that depend on it, so no
> transition is necessary. I would like to ask for exception and let the
> version in experimental to go to unstable.

This migrated to trixie.

Ivo

--- End Message ---
Reply to: