Your message dated Sat, 5 Jul 2025 16:10:18 +0200 with message-id <8e288dfd-fcfc-430a-8efe-b32784242432@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1108331: pre-approval/unblock: opensnitch 1.6.9-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #1108331, regarding pre-approval/unblock: opensnitch 1.6.9-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1108331: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108331 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: pre-approval/unblock: opensnitch 1.6.9-4
- From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 07:35:18 +0200
- Message-id: <sa6o6uboyjt.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Go Packaging Team <team+pkg-go@tracker.debian.org> Control: affects -1 + src:opensnitch User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock I would like some recommondation how to best handle the opensnitch fix for <URL: https://bugs.debian.org/1108139 >. I uploaded a fix for the problem in 1.6.9-3 after experiencing it myself during testing on a new machine, but discovered the BTS report after the upload. The current unstable version 1.6.9-3 lack the Closes: statement in the changelog. The issue is RC, and I would like to get it into testing as soon as possible, and am reluctant to reset the migration timer with a new upload. Would you recomment that I upload a new version 1.6.9-4 with the updated d/changelog right now or that I do so after the 1.6.9-3 version enter testing in 20 days? Or perhaps you can pre-approve such upload and allow it to enter testing quicker to fix the missing runtime dependency? This is the complete set of changes in git since upload 1.6.9-2: diff --git a/debian/README.Debian b/debian/README.sources similarity index 56% rename from debian/README.Debian rename to debian/README.sources index 862f4924..e5c460b3 100644 --- a/debian/README.Debian +++ b/debian/README.sources @@ -10,10 +10,9 @@ In order to build the packages from sources using gbp: it'll download upstream sources according to the d/changelog version, and the upstream tag if it exists. - 4. gbp buildpackage --git-debian-branch=debian/sid --git-tarball-dir=../ --git-no-pristine-tar + 4. gbp buildpackage --git-tarball-dir=../ --git-no-pristine-tar - New debian-go's workflow specifies debian/sid as the default branch, - so you need to specify the branch, or configure it in your gbp.conf. + Follow the new debian-go's workflow, https://go-team.pages.debian.net/workflow-changes.html#wf-2017-11-pristine-tar - -- Gustavo Iñiguez Goya <gustavo.iniguez.goya@gmail.com> Wed, 08 Jun 2023 17:18:40 +0200 + -- Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@debian.org> Thu, 15 May 2025 08:39:51 +0200 diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 0d775f50..088c7423 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@ +opensnitch (1.6.9-4) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium + + * Added forgotten BTS reference for missing python3-packaging + runtime dependency for #1108139. + + -- Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@debian.org> Thu, 26 Jun 2025 07:23:29 +0200 + +opensnitch (1.6.9-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Added python3-packaging as runtime dependency for + python3-opensnitch-ui, seem to need it (Closes: #1108139). + * Corrected name of README.sources and updated to reflect new + reality. + + -- Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@debian.org> Tue, 24 Jun 2025 07:47:33 +0200 + opensnitch (1.6.9-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index efecc117..a95ca97c 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ Depends: libqt5sql5-sqlite, python3-grpcio, python3-notify2, + python3-packaging, python3-pyinotify, python3-pyqt5, python3-pyqt5.qtsql, -- Happy hacking Petter Reinholdtsen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>, 1108331-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1108331: pre-approval/unblock: opensnitch 1.6.9-4
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2025 16:10:18 +0200
- Message-id: <8e288dfd-fcfc-430a-8efe-b32784242432@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] edf1c908-a64d-475c-ae8a-777ed11e04ca@debian.org>
- References: <sa6o6uboyjt.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name> <aF54PGpuBywsc9qx@ramacher.at> <aF54ftum1nFolZ2Z@ramacher.at> <sa6o6uboyjt.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name> <[🔎] sa6tt3r87oi.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name> <sa6o6uboyjt.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name> <[🔎] edf1c908-a64d-475c-ae8a-777ed11e04ca@debian.org>
Hi, On 05-07-2025 08:44, Paul Gevers wrote:On 05-07-2025 08:37, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:I am happy to report that golang-1.24 entered testing today, so that blocker for the opensnitch migration is cleared.We'll have a look later, but to have it show up on our radar, I remove the moreinfo tag.unblocked (not by me ;) ). PaulAttachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---