[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1108796: marked as done (unblock: tkcvs/8.2.3-6)

Your message dated Sat, 05 Jul 2025 13:23:50 +0000
with message-id <E1uY2ru-008K1C-2Q@respighi.debian.org>
and subject line unblock tkcvs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1108796,
regarding unblock: tkcvs/8.2.3-6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1108796: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1108796
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: tkcvs@packages.debian.org, ametzler@bebt.de
Control: affects -1 + src:tkcvs
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package tkcvs

This upload only changes debian/copyright. The data there is incomplete,
most importantly the original author was not listed there. He was aware
of this and quite unhapppy about it. I am not completely sure what went
wrong but I think the original author's copyright info was deleted in
debian/copyright when the software was relicensed from PD to GPL.

Anyway, the new data in debian/copyright is based on the newly added
AUTHORS.txt in tkcvs (tkrev) upstream SVN and tkdiff's README.txt which
were both recently updated when I asked the respective upstreams about
it.

unblock tkcvs/8.2.3-5

cu Andreas
-- 
`What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are
so grateful to you.'
`I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Unblocked tkcvs.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: