Bug#1108435: unblock: nftables/1.1.2-1

[Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>]

Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On 2025-06-28 15:10:41 +0100, Jeremy Sowden wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: nftables@packages.debian.org, azazel@debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:nftables
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package nftables
> 
> [ Reason ]
> The release of nftables currently in testing, 1.1.2, introduces a regression.
> Upstream put out a new release, 1.1.3, shortly afterwards to fix this bug and
> two others.  We would like to get these fixes into Trixie.
> 
> See also https://bugs.debian.org/1107417
> 
> [ Impact ]
> Two existing bugs will remain unfixed and a new one will be introduced.
> 
> [ Tests ]
> Two of the three fixes are covered by the upstream test-suites.
> 
> [ Risks ]
> The only change to the packaging is the update to d/changelog.  The 1.1.3
> upstream release itself only contains these three bug-fixes:
> 
>   $ git log --oneline v1.1.2..v1.1.3
>   4431c70ca96c (tag: v1.1.3) build: Bump version to 1.1.3
>   2fbade3cd990 netlink: bogus concatenated set ranges with netlink message overrun
>   2c41c82296c7 evalute: make vlan pcp updates work
>   63ed8af82ba0 Revert "intervals: do not merge intervals with different timeout"
> 
> so the risks should be minimal.
> 
> [ Checklist ]
>   [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
>   [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
>   [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing

The debdiff seems to be missing.

Cheers

> 
> [ Other info ]
> When the upstream source tar-ball for 1.1.2 was prepared, a number of output
> files generated by running the test-suites were inadvertently included.  The
> 1.1.3 tar-ball does not contains this cruft.  The upshot is that while the
> source-code changes are limited, there is a lot of noise in the debdiff because
> of the removal of the junk files.
> 
> unblock nftables/1.1.2-1
> 

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher