[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1107723: marked as done (unblock: initramfs-tools/0.148.2)

Your message dated Fri, 13 Jun 2025 06:03:28 +0000
with message-id <E1uPxVg-00GXoW-1N@respighi.debian.org>
and subject line unblock initramfs-tools
has caused the Debian Bug report #1107723,
regarding unblock: initramfs-tools/0.148.2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1107723: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1107723
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: initramfs-tools@packages.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:initramfs-tools
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package initramfs-tools

[ Reason ]
- Fix boot from SCSI on s390x
- Fix missing versioned Breaks from initramfs-tools-bin to
  initramfs-tools-core

[ Impact ]
- Boot failure on some s390x systems (bug #1107689)
- Possible file loss in some odd package upgrade and removal sequences
  (Debian policy chapter 7 footnote 3)

[ Tests ]
- Many boot configurations are covered by autopkgtests
- Boot from SCSI on s390x will be tested manually (TBD)

[ Risks ]
These are small and localised changes with low risk of regresion.

[ Checklist ]
  [X] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [X] attach debdiff against the package in testing

[ Other info ]

unblock initramfs-tools/0.148.2

Binary files /var/tmp/umAg_nnSFb/initramfs-tools-0.148.1/copy_file and /var/tmp/g5sujanfmK/initramfs-tools-0.148.2/copy_file differ
diff -Nru initramfs-tools-0.148.1/debian/changelog initramfs-tools-0.148.2/debian/changelog
--- initramfs-tools-0.148.1/debian/changelog	2025-05-28 20:21:18.000000000 +0200
+++ initramfs-tools-0.148.2/debian/changelog	2025-06-13 00:55:37.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+initramfs-tools (0.148.2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  [ Benjamin Drung ]
+  * [3becdb7] Add missing Breaks to initramfs-tools-bin (for moved
+    unmkinitramfs)
+
+  [ Bastian Blank ]
+  * [2246945] Re-add s390 specific scsi drivers (Closes: #1107689)
+
+ -- Ben Hutchings <benh@debian.org>  Fri, 13 Jun 2025 00:55:37 +0200
+
 initramfs-tools (0.148.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * No-change source upload to allow propagation to testing
diff -Nru initramfs-tools-0.148.1/debian/control initramfs-tools-0.148.2/debian/control
--- initramfs-tools-0.148.1/debian/control	2025-05-13 05:22:04.000000000 +0200
+++ initramfs-tools-0.148.2/debian/control	2025-06-13 00:45:03.000000000 +0200
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
 Architecture: any
 Multi-Arch: foreign
 Depends: ${misc:Depends}, ${shlibs:Depends}
+Breaks: initramfs-tools-core (<< 0.148~)
 Replaces: initramfs-tools-core (<< 0.148~)
 Description: generic modular initramfs generator (binary tools)
  This package contains the unmkinitramfs program that can be used to
diff -Nru initramfs-tools-0.148.1/hook-functions initramfs-tools-0.148.2/hook-functions
--- initramfs-tools-0.148.1/hook-functions	2025-05-28 20:21:18.000000000 +0200
+++ initramfs-tools-0.148.2/hook-functions	2025-06-13 00:55:33.000000000 +0200
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@
 		;;
 		scsi)
 			_call_dracut_install -s "${blockfuncs}|iscsi_register_transport" \
-				"=drivers/message/fusion" "=drivers/scsi"
+				"=drivers/message/fusion" "=drivers/s390/scsi" "=drivers/scsi"
 			# The following modules are not covered by the symbol filter
 			# in the previous call but should be included anyway.
 			modules="$modules cxgb3i cxgb4i scsi_dh_alua scsi_dh_emc"

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Unblocked.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: