On 01.06.25 15:20, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 1/6/25 a las 14:54, Paul Gevers escribió:Having said all that, why do *you* think those packages should be removedThey are very big, they have very big build times, and they are in general a burden for QA.
I don't see any QA burden.
Every time I do an archive rebuild to check for any thing, I have to includethose packages so that the archive rebuild is complete. Otherwise I wouldbe unable to say, for example, "there are exactly 50 packages in trixie which will FTBFS if the apt cache is removed before the build" (to put a recent real life example).and why didn't you go to the maintainer, but came straight to us?
well, Santiago feels harassed as seen in the "Proposed MBF: packages that FTBFS with make --shuffle" thread, but is harassing other people to remove stuff what he doesn't like...
The idea of filing a bug against release.debian.org with the GCC maintainers in the Cc (initially X-debbugs-Cc) was to have a discussion between all involved parties,not just the release team. Please keep the GCC maintainers in the Cc.
if you want to be productive, get the gcc-12 package removed for trixie, but as long as these older versions are still used, I don't see any need to remove the cross compilers.