[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1106200: marked as done (unblock: ruby-aws-sdk/1.67.0-3)

Your message dated Sun, 1 Jun 2025 16:10:02 +0000
with message-id <aDx7WrDZBnZ0YZwQ@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1106200: unblock: ruby-aws-sdk/1.67.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1106200,
regarding unblock: ruby-aws-sdk/1.67.0-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1106200: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106200
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ruby-aws-sdk
X-Debbugs-Cc: ruby-aws-sdk@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal

Please unblock package ruby-aws-sdk

This package version fixed a reproducible builds issue.

[ Reason ]
There was a reproducible builds issue because this package was not
rebuilt for more than 5 years. The tooling changed and a simple rebuild
was needed to fix it.

[ Impact ]
The package shipped in Trixie will reproducibly build without issue.

[ Tests ]
Unfortunately, this package runs no test during build time, and
therefore, nothing during autopkgtest time. However, the changes
applied
were cosmetic (bump debhelper version, Stadards-Version, and add a new
runtime dependency for ${ruby:Depends}). There is no code change.

I manually installed the package and made use of the main functions and
it is working well.

[ Risks ]
The risk is that something changed in the new debhelper that made it
behave differently. I, personally, did not spotted any issue, but
that's
the only risk that I foresee.

There is no code change, so nothing related to the upstream code is
expected.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing

unblock ruby-aws-sdk/1.67.0-3

diff -Nru ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/changelog ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/changelog
--- ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/changelog	2018-03-18 22:45:48.000000000 -0300
+++ ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/changelog	2025-05-07 15:03:18.000000000 -0300
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+ruby-aws-sdk (1.67.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Team upload.
+  * Bump debhelper compat level to 13
+  * Declare compliance with Debian Policy 4.7.1
+  * d/control: runtime depend on ${ruby:Depends}
+
+ -- Lucas Kanashiro <kanashiro@debian.org>  Wed, 07 May 2025 15:03:18 -0300
+
 ruby-aws-sdk (1.67.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Team upload.
diff -Nru ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/compat ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/compat
--- ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/compat	2018-03-18 22:45:48.000000000 -0300
+++ ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/compat	1969-12-31 21:00:00.000000000 -0300
@@ -1 +0,0 @@
-11
diff -Nru ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/control ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/control
--- ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/control	2018-03-18 22:45:48.000000000 -0300
+++ ruby-aws-sdk-1.67.0/debian/control	2025-05-07 15:03:18.000000000 -0300
@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
 Priority: optional
 Maintainer: Debian Ruby Extras Maintainers <pkg-ruby-extras-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
 Uploaders: David Suárez <david.sephirot@gmail.com>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 11~),
+Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13),
                gem2deb
-Standards-Version: 4.1.3
+Standards-Version: 4.7.1
 Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-aws-sdk.git
 Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/ruby-aws-sdk.git
 Homepage: https://aws.amazon.com/sdkforruby
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
          ruby-json (>= 1.4),
          ruby-nokogiri (>= 1),
          ruby-uuidtools (>= 2.1),
+         ${ruby:Depends},
          ${misc:Depends},
          ${shlibs:Depends}
 Suggests: pry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On Thu, May 29, 2025 at 10:05:42AM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 29-05-2025 01:20, Lucas Kanashiro wrote:
> > Right, it is not. I ran diffoscope against the two versions, you can
> > see the output attached. From what I can see, there are just the
> > changes I already presented via debdiff plus some timestamp changes in
> > some files.
> 
> 
> I was more thinking of a diffoscope diff with and without the bump. Because
> of the large list of changes in the files, it's hard to check if e.g. there
> are no new/missing files. I expect the timestamp of the files to be due to
> changes in rules-requires-root defaults, so a diff like I propose would make
> the check much more trivial.

I double-checked the changes in the .deb and unblocked ruby-aws-sdk.

Thanks,

Ivo

--- End Message ---
Reply to: