Bug#1105152: Fwd: unblock dhcpcd
Hi,
backports is not release team territory. But not that during the freeze
I think that the rules to only upload once packages reached testing is
important. Not everything will migrate until trixie is released.
Cheers
On 2025-05-25 18:50:00 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> seems I fucked-up your mail address when trying to add you in CC. See
> below...
>
> Best regards,
> Micha
>
> -------- Forwarded Message --------
> Subject: Re: unblock dhcpcd
> Date: Sun, 25 May 2025 18:47:55 +0200
> From: Micha Lenk <micha@debian.org>
> To: Martin-Éric Racine <martin-eric.racine@iki.fi>
> CC: 1105152@bugs.debian.org, "Sebastian Ramacher
> <sramacher"@respighi.debian.org
>
>
>
> Hi Martin-Éric,
>
> On Thu, 22 May 2025 11:13:22 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
> wrote:
> > On 2025-05-22 12:04:31 +0300, Martin-Éric Racine wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 May 2025 15:32:43 +0000 Sebastian Ramacher
> > > <sramacher@respighi.debian.org> wrote:
> > > > Unblocked.
> > > > Please note that the unblock didn't work. Instead, the delay got
> > > lenghtened from 10 to 20 days.
> >
> > It did:
> >
> > Migration status for dhcpcd (1:10.1.0-10 to 1:10.1.0-11): Waiting for
> > test results or another package, or too young (no action required now -
> > check later)
> > Issues preventing migration:
> > ∙ ∙ Too young, only 13 of 20 days old
> > Additional info:
> > ∙ ∙ Piuparts tested OK -
> > https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/d/dhcpcd.html
> > ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for dhcpcd/1:10.1.0-11: amd64: Pass, arm64: No tests,
> > superficial or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), armel: No tests,
> > superficial or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: No tests,
> > superficial or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), i386: No tests, superficial
> > or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), ppc64el: No tests, superficial or
> > marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), riscv64: No tests, superficial or marked
> > flaky ♻ (reference ♻), s390x: No tests, superficial or marked flaky ♻
> > (reference ♻)
> > ∙ ∙ Reproducible on amd64 - info ♻
> > ∙ ∙ Reproducible on arm64 - info ♻
> > ∙ ∙ Waiting for reproducibility test results on armhf - info ♻
> > ∙ ∙ Reproducible on i386 - info ♻
> > ∙ ∙ Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by sramacher
> >
> > The change in the age requirement is due to the start of the hard
> > freeze.
> Please note, currently the dhcpcd package in bookworm-backports is newer
> than the package in trixie. This means, if dhcpcd 1:10.1.0-11 doesn't
> migrate before trixie is released, we will end up with a situation where
> systems upgrading from bookworm + bookworm-backports to trixie and having
> the dhcpcd from bookworm-backports installed will have their dhcpcd package
> remain on version 1:10.1.0-11~bpo12+1 from bookworm-backports.
>
> @Sebastian, I don't know whether this needs to be tracked in some way by the
> release team. Will you take care of that in case we need it?
>
> @Martin-Éric, please, in the future don't upload versions to
> stable-backports which have not migrated to testing yet.
>
> Best regards,
> Micha
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: