[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1106409: marked as done (unblock: magics++/4.16.0+really4.15.5-1)

Your message dated Mon, 26 May 2025 09:25:05 +0000
with message-id <CAM8zJQuw9LKGZYviQZCgRiF+JFG4=1w1SY_t04RGEUcX+cdTig@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1106409: unblock: magics++/4.16.0+really4.15.5-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1106409,
regarding unblock: magics++/4.16.0+really4.15.5-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1106409: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106409
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: magics++@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:magics++
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package magics++

[ Reason ]

I'm not sure why magics++ wasn't ready to migrate before.
It was uploaded in April but never built until yesterday. I guess it
was waiting for a dependency to get fixed, which has only just been
fixed.

magics++ doesn't have debian/tests, so needs a manual unblock to
proceed into trixie.


[ Impact ]

The block on magics++ is threatening removal of sasview (and metview)
from trixie, which would be regrettable.

[ Tests ]

magics++ does not have debian/tests, unfortunately, which is why this
manual unblock is needed.


[ Risks ]

Low risks in the sense that magics++ is only used by a small handful
of packages (metview, sasview in some way)


[ Checklist ]
  [ ] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  Documented as "New upstream release".
  [ ] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  No, this is not "my" package. I'm just trying to prevent removal of sasview.
  [ ] attach debdiff against the package in testing
  magics++/4.16.0 is a new upstream release that should have been
built in April before hard freeze.  Upstream source contains data
files, making it impractical to make a debdiff.

[ Other info ]

I don't have a direct interest in magics++, I'm just trying to prevent
removal of sasview. For what's it's worth, I cannot see why magics++
removal is threatening sasview removal. I can't see a direct
dependency.

unblock magics++/4.16.0-1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Unblocked, thanks.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: