[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1106114: marked as done (unblock: jinjax/0.57+dfsg-1)

Your message dated Sat, 24 May 2025 21:32:24 +0200
with message-id <96d57d98-522a-4166-a801-0ae1f5e6bdf8@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1106114: unblock: jinjax/0.57+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1106114,
regarding unblock: jinjax/0.57+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1106114: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1106114
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,

please unblock jinjax 0.57+dfsg-1:

  * jinjax is a sort-of pre-processor to jinja2 templates that adds
    additional functionality that is not present in jinja2 vanilla
    (https://jinjax.scaletti.dev)

  * it has been reported that when using certain javascript or otherwise
    "code" within the templates, that jinjax chokes on it and fails to
    work.

  * this is due to the fact, that jinjax <=0.56 had a very crud way to
    detect its own structure elements within the templates with a regex.

  * jinjax 0.57 fixes this by adding a proper parser for its own
    elements, the commit for this is:
    https://github.com/jpsca/jinjax/pull/119

  * this is the only difference between 0.56 and 0.57, as can be seen
    here:
https://forgejo.debian.net/python/jinjax/commit/067f4dc8b639767b83048f1dcedd12cb438270b0 

  * between 0.56+dfsg-1 and 0.57+dfsg-1, there have been no other
    changes to the package.
Unblocking jinjax 0.57+dfsg-1 would put a jinjax version into trixie that is real-world usable, not just with limited "examples" as the 0.56+dfsg-1 version to the extend, that I don't think jinjax 0.56+dfsg-1 should be shipped in trixie. 

Regards,
Daniel

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 24-05-2025 19:43, Daniel Baumann wrote:

On 5/24/25 15:36, Paul Gevers wrote:

Can you please provide this as a debdiff in this bug report?


sure - debdiff is attached.



Hints added.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: