Re: Bug#1106121: isc-dhcp - EOL and not security supported
Control: severity -1 serious
On 2025-05-22 15:04:43 -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote:
> Control: severity -1 important
>
> El 19/05/25 a las 22:26, Bastian Blank escribió:
> > Source: isc-dhcp
> > Version: 4.4.3-P1-7
> > Severity: serious
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: waldi@debian.org
> >
> > isc-dhcp is EOL and marked as not security supported. It should not be
> > released with trixie.
> >
> > See
> > https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/dhcp-users/2022-October/022786.html
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035972
> >
> > Bastian
>
> While I consider that users of isc-dhcp-{client,server} should migrate
> to alternative implementation, I think it is too late now to ask for the
> removal of isc-dhcp, being so close to release trixie.
>
> It is to note that, TTBOMK, there is currently no substitute for
> isc-dhcp-relay.
>
> https://www.debian.org/releases/bookworm/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#deprecated-components
> reads:
>
> "The security team will support the isc-dhcp package during the bookworm
> lifetime, but the package will likely be unsupported in the next stable
> release, see bug #1035972 (isc-dhcp EOL'ed) for more details."
>
> That doesn't mean that it will be remove in trixie.
It's dead. Except for fai-quickstart all reverse dependencies have MRs.
I am all for getting it removed.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: