Hi,On Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:50:15 +0200 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> Right. But coot is the only reverse-depdency, and I think it is ok to > rebuild it for trixie and then re-assess the situation post-trixie. E.g. > we could remove the shared library. It is not ideal, but scheduled the rebuild. Please make sure that librdkit1t64 gains a Breaks on the old version of coot.
This still needs to happen. As I scheduled the autopkgtest combination to quickly in reply to bug 1103579 (which was CC-ed to the RT) rdkit is now blocked by an explicit block hint by me. Please let us know when the Breaks is added.
Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature