[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1103975: marked as done (unblock: hueplusplus/1.2.0+ds-1)

Your message dated Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:11:48 +0100
with message-id <69d05f03-d578-4f22-b9e6-ec272c261146@khalifa.ws>
and subject line closing duplicate
has caused the Debian Bug report #1103975,
regarding unblock: hueplusplus/1.2.0+ds-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1103975: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103975
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Control: affects -1 + src:hueplusplus

Please unblock package hueplusplus

It's a new package, not a version update to an existing one.

[ Reason ]
hueplusplus is a small library needed for openrgb, which is also blocked (separate bug #1103972). 

[ Impact ]
Almost none, it's a small shared library and documentation and it's pretty stable and not many releases/fixes expected over the lifetime of Trixie. 

[ Tests ]
Manually tested through its only reverse dependency: openrgb.

[ Risks ]
New library with only one new reverse dependency, no impact on the stability of the debian release. 

[ Checklist ]
  [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [ ] attach debdiff against the package in testing

[ Other info ]
None

unblock hueplusplus/1.2.0+ds-1

--
Regards,
Ahmad

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
duplicate bug as first took almost an hour to process.

--
Regards,
Ahmad

--- End Message ---
Reply to: