Your message dated Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:50:15 +0200 with message-id <aAYi5_NoGNN_BjPq@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#1103162: nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #1103162, regarding nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1103162: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1103162 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1
- From: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 19:49:00 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 174465294096.5008.14195259237114688010.reportbug@lightning.caipicrew.dd-dns.de>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against librdkit-dev"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>, 1103162-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1103162: nmu: coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2025 12:50:15 +0200
- Message-id: <aAYi5_NoGNN_BjPq@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 680170c1.050a0220.20119b.1308@mx.google.com>
- References: <[🔎] 174465294096.5008.14195259237114688010.reportbug@lightning.caipicrew.dd-dns.de> <[🔎] Z_3_eyESiTuhpEHa@ramacher.at> <[🔎] 174465294096.5008.14195259237114688010.reportbug@lightning.caipicrew.dd-dns.de> <[🔎] 67fe76f5.df0a0220.37ea24.0ebe@mx.google.com> <[🔎] aACin1YYqrseJw24@ramacher.at> <[🔎] 174465294096.5008.14195259237114688010.reportbug@lightning.caipicrew.dd-dns.de> <[🔎] 680170c1.050a0220.20119b.1308@mx.google.com>
On 2025-04-17 23:21:05 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 08:41:35AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2025-04-15 17:10:44 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 08:40:59AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > > > On 2025-04-14 19:49:00 +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > > > Severity: normal > > > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > > > > Usertags: binnmu > > > > > > > > > > nmu coot_1.1.15+dfsg-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against librdkit-dev" > > > > > > > > Why is this needed? > > > > > > The autopkgtests fail: > > > > > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/coot/testing/amd64/ > > > https://ci.debian.net/packages/c/coot/testing/amd64/59906919/ > > > > If symbols go missing from librdkit, this smells like a SONAME bump that > > is missing from librdkit. > > Right. But coot is the only reverse-depdency, and I think it is ok to > rebuild it for trixie and then re-assess the situation post-trixie. E.g. > we could remove the shared library. It is not ideal, but scheduled the rebuild. Please make sure that librdkit1t64 gains a Breaks on the old version of coot. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---