Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: ncts@debian.org Dear RT, As Paul Gevers helpfully clarified in #1102599,
In transition context, we generally consider "small" when numbers are in the low single digit. Otherwise we'd want to be involved/informed.
The freeze policy page isn't that specific though:
No large/disruptive changes Any change which is large or disruptive, which requires coordination or has a higher change of regressions is no longer appropriate at this time.
IMHO it's a good idea to be more specific in what "large" and "disruptive" mean. FWIW, the "which"s that follow fit in "disruptive", but aren't necessarily "large". If I read Paul's review right, the (essentially) transition I asked for isn't disruptive, but large. Thanks. -- ,Sdrager Blair Noctis
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature