[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1100876: marked as done (transition: kdsingleapplication)

Your message dated Fri, 4 Apr 2025 09:59:56 +0100
with message-id <f331f09b-b2d9-44df-8439-4e6a8a701582@pblackman.plus.com>
and subject line Close 1100876 No ABI change, transition not needed
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100876,
regarding transition: kdsingleapplication
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1100876: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100876
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: kdsingleapplication@packages.debian.org, peter@pblackman.plus.com 
Control: affects -1 + src:kdsingleapplication
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear Release Team,

Requesting a transition slot for kdsingleapplication.
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-kdsingleapplication.html

Hoping it can make Trixie, as its a small transition,
but I realise now that it may not.

There are three reverse dependencies in testing, that all build,
including one of mine (strawberry), so two binNMUs would be needed,
nheko and owncloud-client. Also, there is kaidan in unstable.

Ben file:

title = "kdsingleapplication";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libkdsingleapplication-qt6-1.0" | .depends ~
"libkdsingleapplication-qt6-1.1";
is_good = .depends ~ "libkdsingleapplication-qt6-1.1";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libkdsingleapplication-qt6-1.0";

Regards,
Peter

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
No ABI change, transition not needed

--- End Message ---
Reply to: