[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1100876: transition: kdsingleapplication



On Thursday, April 3, 2025 12:41:32 PM CEST Peter Blackman wrote:
> 
> Hi Sune,
> 
> Just to clarify, would that avoid the need for a transition?
> 
> In my defence, it seemed incongruous to have upstream version 1.1
> building a binary package named ...-1.0
> but happy to do it that way if that's best.

The number in the package name is an ABI identifier, not a version requirement. 
Sometimes they match, sometimes they don't. They often don't.

/Sune
-- 
I didn’t stop pretending when I became an adult, it’s just that when I was a 
kid I was pretending that I fit into the rules and structures of this world. 
And now that I’m an adult, I pretend that those rules and structures exist.
   - zefrank


Reply to: