Your message dated Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:04:20 +0200 with message-id <792a1916-e3e4-413b-91de-73d16ff1865c@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1100166: transition: onnxruntime has caused the Debian Bug report #1100166, regarding transition: onnxruntime to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1100166: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100166 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: onnxruntime
- From: Shengqi Chen <harry@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:24:06 +0800
- Message-id: <174176424611.9865.7884882415774029810.reportbug@Harry-Raptor.>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: affects -1 = src:onnxruntime Dear release managers, Upstream has just released onnxruntime 1.21.0, leading to a SONAME change. I would like to request a transition slot for it. Additional information: * I have modified my patch to include only MAJOR.MINOR version numbers in the SOVERSION. So we could expect less frequent transitions afterwards. * The only rev-dep gst-plugins-bad1.0 can compile without issue. Ben file (automatic one looks good): title = "onnxruntime"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libonnxruntime1.20.1" | .depends ~ "libonnxruntime1.21"; is_good = .depends ~ "libonnxruntime1.21"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libonnxruntime1.20.1"; -- Thanks, Shengqi Chen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 1100166-done@bugs.debian.org, Shengqi Chen <harry@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#1100166: transition: onnxruntime
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2025 10:04:20 +0200
- Message-id: <792a1916-e3e4-413b-91de-73d16ff1865c@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <8bf1c655-f1e5-4094-aa02-832374f5279d@debian.org>
- References: <67d13810.df0a0220.223605.306bSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN@mx.google.com> <8bf1c655-f1e5-4094-aa02-832374f5279d@debian.org> <8bf1c655-f1e5-4094-aa02-832374f5279d@debian.org>
Hi,On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:19:19 +0100 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> wrote:Go ahead.The package migrated and the old binaries are removed. PaulAttachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---