[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1094736: transition: libcdio



* Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
> 
> Can't we fix this by using breaks, as I suggested? That'd be way simpler than 
> reverting the transition.

Yes, we can.

It would be a breaks between libcdio sub-packages, though, e.g.:

  libcdio19 (>= 2.2.0) breaks libiso9660 (< 2.2.0)

since the mixing of these two versions is what causes the segfault
(even if we remove libdevice-cdio-perl from the equation), as explained
in the message to upstream:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libcdio-devel/2025-03/msg00000.html

I'm happy with fixing it with breaks if you think that this is preferred.

Cheers,
Gabriel


Reply to: