Bug#1100580: marked as done (transition: tree-sitter)
Your message dated Thu, 20 Mar 2025 23:05:41 +0100
with message-id <Z9yRNbvSJfIfbbzj@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1100580: transition: tree-sitter
has caused the Debian Bug report #1100580,
regarding transition: tree-sitter
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1100580: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100580
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: tree-sitter@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:tree-sitter
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
The tree-sitter 0.22.6 packages in unstable accidentally included an ABI
break. This was noticed via #1100171. I've backported upstream's change
to include the minor version in the SONAME (since they're following
semver and are still pre-1.0).
There are only two rdeps which are also in testing -- neovim and emacs.
There are no source changes needed to the rdeps, just binNMUs once the
new binary package is uploaded to unstable.
Ben file:
title = "tree-sitter";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libtree-sitter0" | .depends ~ "libtree-sitter0.22";
is_good = .depends ~ "libtree-sitter0.22";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libtree-sitter0";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2025-03-16 16:17:39 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2025 at 08:42:28PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > On 2025-03-15 13:33:13 -0400, James McCoy wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: important
> > > X-Debbugs-Cc: tree-sitter@packages.debian.org
> > > Control: affects -1 + src:tree-sitter
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: transition
> > >
> > > The tree-sitter 0.22.6 packages in unstable accidentally included an ABI
> > > break. This was noticed via #1100171. I've backported upstream's change
> > > to include the minor version in the SONAME (since they're following
> > > semver and are still pre-1.0).
> > >
> > > There are only two rdeps which are also in testing -- neovim and emacs.
> > >
> > > There are no source changes needed to the rdeps, just binNMUs once the
> > > new binary package is uploaded to unstable.
> >
> > Since the ABI change is already in unstable, please go ahead.
>
> Thanks. Done.
The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: