Bug#1094897: marked as done (transition: insighttoolkit5)
Your message dated Wed, 19 Mar 2025 07:38:27 +0100
with message-id <Z9pmY5BOJMp_5l-k@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1094897: transition: insighttoolkit5
has caused the Debian Bug report #1094897,
regarding transition: insighttoolkit5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1094897: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094897
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: insighttoolkit5
- From: "Steve M. Robbins" <steve@sumost.ca>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 22:35:56 -0600
- Message-id: <173838455651.2503884.11710462247296231166.reportbug@riemann.sumost.ca>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: insighttoolkit5@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:insighttoolkit5
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I've uploaded insighttoolkit5 (ITK) v5.4 to experimental and it has cleared
NEW.
The disposition of ITK's five reverse dependencies is listed below.
ants: fails to build, but upstream github sources DO build
- filed bug #1094896
camitk: one test failed during my rebuild
- filed bug #1094895
elastix: have uploaded new version to experimental, which builds OK
plastimatch: builds OK with no source changes
sight: fails to build
- filed bug #1094894
Ben file:
title = "insighttoolkit5";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libinsighttoolkit5.3" | .depends ~
"libinsighttoolkit5.4";
is_good = .depends ~ "libinsighttoolkit5.4";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libinsighttoolkit5.3";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 1094897-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1094897: transition: insighttoolkit5
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2025 07:38:27 +0100
- Message-id: <Z9pmY5BOJMp_5l-k@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <dd3d2714-2ffe-4db8-950d-0ade36537d4c@debian.org>
- References: <173838455651.2503884.11710462247296231166.reportbug@riemann.sumost.ca> <173838455651.2503884.11710462247296231166.reportbug@riemann.sumost.ca> <dd3d2714-2ffe-4db8-950d-0ade36537d4c@debian.org>
On 2025-02-11 15:59:00 +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 01/02/2025 05:35, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: insighttoolkit5@packages.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:insighttoolkit5
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > I've uploaded insighttoolkit5 (ITK) v5.4 to experimental and it has cleared
> > NEW.
> > The disposition of ITK's five reverse dependencies is listed below.
> >
> >
> > ants: fails to build, but upstream github sources DO build
> > - filed bug #1094896
> >
> > camitk: one test failed during my rebuild
> > - filed bug #1094895
> >
> > elastix: have uploaded new version to experimental, which builds OK
> >
> > plastimatch: builds OK with no source changes
> >
> > sight: fails to build
> > - filed bug #1094894
>
> Go ahead.
This transition is complete.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: