Your message dated Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:13:19 +0100 with message-id <c7bb3ad4-80bd-4566-ac44-5254cdf6738d@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#1094931: transition: onnxruntime has caused the Debian Bug report #1094931, regarding transition: onnxruntime to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1094931: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1094931 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian BTS <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: onnxruntime
- From: Shengqi Chen <harry@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2025 16:03:54 +0100
- Message-id: <6334EF44-291F-4753-AC6D-F3201E1C9449@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-ai@lists.debian.org, lumin@debian.org, harry@debian.org, daissi@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:onnxruntime Control: block -1 by 1094440 Dear Release Managers, I would like to request a transition slot for onnxruntime, which has its SOVERSION bumped from 1.19.2 to 1.20.1. Since new onnxruntime requires newer xnnpack than in sid, this transition should be started after #1094440 is finished (at least after new xnnpack is uploaded to sid). The auto-onnxruntime transition has a needless "python3-onnxruntime” package (but certainly works). A precise Ben file would be: title = “onnxruntime 1.20.1"; is_affected = .depends ~ /\blibonnxruntime(1\.20\.1|1\.19\.2)\b/; is_good = .depends ~ /\b(libonnxruntime1\.20\.1)\b/; is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(libonnxruntime1\.19\.2)\b/; -- Thanks, Shengqi Chen
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Shengqi Chen <harry@debian.org>, 1094931-done@bugs.debian.org, lumin@debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1094931: transition: onnxruntime
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:13:19 +0100
- Message-id: <c7bb3ad4-80bd-4566-ac44-5254cdf6738d@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <d17354b4-399a-4d8f-a1d0-f022f0e02124@debian.org>
- References: <6334EF44-291F-4753-AC6D-F3201E1C9449@debian.org> <ceb7c537-1ee2-4519-8eac-71bc4ab3e7fa@debian.org> <0979E435-D57E-47E4-BE35-EE23F3744FD3@debian.org> <29C8546E-DE8D-48D4-8083-0DA23A8F3468@debian.org> <d17354b4-399a-4d8f-a1d0-f022f0e02124@debian.org>
On 18/02/2025 14:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:Control: tags -1 confirmed On 18/02/2025 14:09, Shengqi Chen wrote:Hi,2025年2月2日 23:06,Shengqi Chen <harry@debian.org> 写道: Hi,2025年2月2日 10:57,Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org> 写道: onnxruntime failed to build on arm64. Please take a look:That is #1094828. And it reproduces on both gcc-14/15. We are trying to find some workaround, if not fixes.I just realized my reply is wrong, #1094828 is pytorch-related. We have, anyway, now fixed arm64 FTBFS in 1.20.1+dfsg-1~exp3. I have confirmed that gst-plugins-bad1.0, the only build-rdep of onnxruntime against 1.20.1, builds against this new version.Go ahead.This was done. Let's close the bug. Emilio
--- End Message ---