Bug#1099894: transition: addresses-for-gnustep/gnustep-addresses
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2025-03-09 14:41:21 +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: addresses-for-gnustep@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:addresses-for-gnustep + src:gnustep-addresses
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Our intention was to do this transition together with the rest of the
> GNUstep libraries (RT #1099081) but the package has been in NEW until
> today. This is a bugfix release following a full audit of the code
> inspired by #1087735. To cite the upstream announcement [1]:
>
> ,----
> | AddressManager and Addresses Frameworks got a major maintenance
> | release, 0.5.0. Highly recommended: code modernisation, highly
> | improved encoding detection and RFC compliance for UTF-8, display
> | fixes, memory and initialization handling, crash fixers....
> `----
>
> Both rdeps agenda.app and gnumail build fine against the new version.
Please go ahead.
Cheers
>
> There is no auto tracker because the source package was renamed from
> addresses-for-gnustep to gnustep-addresses to match the naming
> convention that was proposed to the FTP masters [2] and the rest of
> the GNUstep libraries/frameworks in the archive.
>
> Here is a ben file constructed by reportbug:
>
> title = "addresses-for-gnustep/gnustep-addresses";
> is_affected = .depends ~ "libaddresses0" | .depends ~ "libaddressview0" | .depends ~ "libaddresses0.5.0" | .depends ~ "libaddressview0.5.0";
> is_good = .depends ~ "libaddresses0.5.0" | .depends ~ "libaddressview0.5.0";
> is_bad = .depends ~ "libaddresses0" | .depends ~ "libaddressview0";
>
> [1] https://savannah.nongnu.org/news/?id=10726
> [2] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-gnustep-maintainers/2025-January/006272.html
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: