Bug#1049422: Follow-up: Bug#1049422: transition: dbus-c++

[Thomas Uhle <thomas.uhle@tu-dresden.de>]

Dear maintainers,

as a brief update: I have just realized that currently jami-daemon is not 
in trixie, and the version in experimental has switched from 
libdbus-c++-1-0v5 to libsdbus-c++1.  So as long as the version in bookworm 
does not count, it is only ffado-dbus-server left that is not rebuilt when 
building package dbus-c++.  I still think that a binNMU is not necessary.

Best regards,

Thomas Uhle



On Mon, 3 Mar 2025, Thomas Uhle wrote:

> Dear maintainers,
>
> unless a certain strict Debian rule formally enforces a transition, I don't 
> think that a transition is really necessary because still the only packages 
> depending on libdbus-c++-1-0v5 are ffado-dbus-server and jami-daemon (cf. 
> #1018772 [1]).  I have double-checked both to be sure that they only have a 
> dependency on libdbus-c++-1.so.0 but not on libdbus-c++-glib-1.so.0 or 
> libdbus-c++-ecore-1.so.0.  The only other packages depending on these 
> libraries are libdbus-c++-bin and libdbus-c++-dev themselves which have 
> updated dependencies in Debian experimental.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas Uhle
>
>
> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/1018772#5