Bug#1098925: transition: glibc 2.41
Hi Sebastian,
On 2025-03-01 18:28, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2025-03-01 15:47:36 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Anyway I have started to look briefly at autopkgtest regressions, and it
> > appears that my assumption that checking executable stack only on amd64
> > was going to be representative for all architecture was wrong. It seems
> > that at least hand written neon code on armel/armhf also causes the
> > stack to be executable. I'll scan the archive on other architectures but
> > that will take some time... In the meantime I have already found:
> >
> > nmu 3 libde265 . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"
> > nmu libmad . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"
> > nmu x264 . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"
>
> Scheduled.
Thanks.
I have finished scanning the archive for the other architectures.
Fortunately the number of affected packages are limited. I have found
the following binNMUs are needed:
For armel/armhf:
nmu doublecmd . armel armhf . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"
nmu 3 mpeg2dec . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"
nmu ne10 . armel armhf . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"
nmu pdbg . armel ppc64el ppc64 . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"
For armel/armhf/s390x:
nmu openblas . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"
For i386:
nmu 3 libfec_1.0-26-gc5d935f-1 . ANY . -m "Rebuild with binutils >= 2.44-2 to build without executable stack" --extra-depends "binutils (>= 2.44-2)"
Note that I am sure about the architectures for doublecmd, I do not
think we need multiarch sync, but I might be wrong.
Cheers
Aurelien
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurelien@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
Reply to: