Bug#1095265: marked as done (nmu: audtty_0.1.12-5.1)
Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2025 07:47:19 +0200
with message-id <CANjV3xkRNJo5pWKdx2gHyfPcRNHSVZzgMHk7z4pY0dL_UMcm_A@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#1095265: nmu: audtty_0.1.12-5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1095265,
regarding nmu: audtty_0.1.12-5.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1095265: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1095265
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu audtty_0.1.12-5.1 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild for time_t"
Last year audtty was excluded from the mass binNMUs for the t64
transition apparently because something made it ftbfs during the time
those were scheduled (see [1], [2]) but that has been fixed.
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/1066318
[2] https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/history/audtty.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 1095265-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1095265: nmu: audtty_0.1.12-5.1
- From: Esa Peuha <esa.peuha@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 07:47:19 +0200
- Message-id: <CANjV3xkRNJo5pWKdx2gHyfPcRNHSVZzgMHk7z4pY0dL_UMcm_A@mail.gmail.com>
audtty was rebuilt and migrated to testing, so I'm closing this bug.
--- End Message ---
Reply to: