[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1085408: marked as done ((some kind of) transition: add python3.13 as a supported python3 version)

Your message dated Mon, 23 Dec 2024 10:15:13 -0100
with message-id <CAM8zJQu=MDXUXXcXiTJ5VKFv0w-G-cyByY1NzowsGKot9KghTQ@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line (some kind of) transition: add python3.13 as a supported python3 version
has caused the Debian Bug report #1085408,
regarding (some kind of) transition: add python3.13 as a supported python3 version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1085408: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1085408
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Please setup a tracker to add python3.13 as a supported python3 version. This is non-blocking, as packages can migrate on their own once built. I'm not yet starting this, just want to have an overview of affected packages. 

The tracker already exists as
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.13-add.html
The upstream release did already happen, so we should be able to start that within the next two weeks.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
python3-defaults 3.12.7-1 migrated, adding Python 3.13 as a supported
version in trixie.

The autopkgtests of the following packages (along with their RC bug
numbers) were allowed to regress:

dask #1088234

dask.distributed #1088286

rich #1082290

spyder #1089054

Regards
Graham

--- End Message ---
Reply to: