[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1088797: marked as done (transition: libfm-qt)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Dec 2024 18:12:18 +0100
with message-id <739782ff-8690-48d3-bd79-c4c8f7b1bb0a@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1088797: transition: libfm-qt
has caused the Debian Bug report #1088797,
regarding transition: libfm-qt
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1088797: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1088797
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: libfm-qt@packages.debian.org, team+lxqt@tracker.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libfm-qt
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

We request to have transition for libfm-qt for Qt6. All affected
packages are built in experimental.

https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libfm-qt.html

Ben file:

title = "libfm-qt";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libfm-qt14" | .depends ~ "libfm-qt6-14";
is_good = .depends ~ "libfm-qt6-14";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libfm-qt14";

-- 
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) czchen@{czchen,debian}.org
Key fingerprint = BA04 346D C2E1 FE63 C790  8793 CC65 B0CD EC27 5D5B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 06/12/2024 12:22, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:

On 04/12/2024 23:50, ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:

On Tue, Dec 03, 2024 at 11:34:16AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:

libfm-qt upstream has another soversion bump in latestm version. Shall
we send another transition for new soversion bump after this one? Or
shall we do the transition together with this?


Upload the new version to experimental already in order to clear NEW, then
let us know and we shall see if we wait for the current package to migrate
or just go ahead.


libfm-qt 2.1.0-1~exp1 has entered experimental. Please help to check if
we need to wait for the current package to migrate, or just go ahead.
I hinted libfm-qt so it would migrate to testing, which it did, so we can go ahead now. I see you have already uploaded libfm-qt and the rdeps, so things are looking good. 

The old library package just got removed from testing, so let's close this.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: