[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: binNMUs for broken udebs (was Bug#1086735: libx11-6: buggy shlibs, libx11-xcb1 vs. libx11-6-udeb)



Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (2024-12-07):
> This was addressed a few weeks back (through libx11 2:1.8.10-2) but
> there were no requests to binNMU packages to fix dependencies.
> 
> The following 8 binary packages are broken on arm64 exclusively (which
> presumably had its own thing going at the right moment):
> 
>     libxfixes3-udeb
>     libxft2-udeb
>     libxinerama1-udeb
>     libxkbfile1-udeb
>     libxrandr2-udeb
>     libxrender1-udeb
>     libxtst6-udeb
>     matchbox-keyboard-udeb
> 
> which translates to those source packages (modulo xft's position):
> 
>     libxfixes
>     libxinerama
>     libxkbfile
>     libxrandr
>     libxrender
>     libxtst
>     matchbox-keyboard
>     xft
> 
> I'll let you decide whether you prefer binNMU on all architectures or
> just arm64.

Ping? We are still unable to build d-i on arm64…


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: