Bug#1088632: transition: hdf5

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>]

On 10/12/2024 22:10, pini@debian.org wrote:
> Le 2024-12-10 09:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > On 08/12/2024 15:37, pini@debian.org wrote:
> > > Le 2024-11-29 00:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> > > > On 28/11/2024 21:45, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> > > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > > Severity: normal
> > > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > > Usertags: transition
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Release Team,
> > > > >
> > > > > I am requesting a transition slot for HDF5 1.14 currently in experimental. 
> > > > > I've run a test rebuild of the 154 reverse dependencies. Out of them most 
> > > > > of the FTBFS are currently not in testing and the other have patch 
> > > > > proposals [1]. There is only issue left: #1087738 (khl). I am confident it 
> > > > > will be solved because khl's maintainer is its upstream as well.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/bts-usertags.cgi? 
> > > > > user=pini%40debian.org&tag=ftbfs-hdf5-1.14
> > > > >
> > > > > Please let me know in case you think other issues need attention.
> > > >
> > > > This should wait until openmpi 5 is in testing.
> > >
> > > Now that openmpi 5 is in testing is there any other blocker left?
> >
> > No, go ahead.
>
> Uploaded.

There are a few autopkgtest regressions. I briefly looked at fast5 and it looks 
like its examples need changes for the new API. I haven't looked at the others. 
Can you take a look and file bugs as appropriate?

Cheers,
Emilio