Bug#1086616: marked as done (nmu: rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-7+b2)
Your message dated Thu, 7 Nov 2024 13:05:13 +0100
with message-id <efc08c53-af66-4acf-a6f3-76da207792cb@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1086616: nmu: rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-7+b2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1086616,
regarding nmu: rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-7+b2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1086616: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1086616
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-bindgen-cli@packages.debian.org, noisycoil@tutanota.com
Control: affects -1 + src:rust-bindgen-cli
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-7+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with librust-bindgen-dev 0.66.1-11"
Hello,
To fully address bug #1086510, rust-bindgen-cli must be rebuilt with
librust-bindgen-dev 0.66.1-11. The latter became available in unstable after
the last dinstall.
Thank you!
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 02/11/2024 08:58, NoisyCoil wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: rust-bindgen-cli@packages.debian.org, noisycoil@tutanota.com
Control: affects -1 + src:rust-bindgen-cli
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu rust-bindgen-cli_0.66.1-7+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with librust-bindgen-dev 0.66.1-11"
Hello,
To fully address bug #1086510, rust-bindgen-cli must be rebuilt with
librust-bindgen-dev 0.66.1-11. The latter became available in unstable after
the last dinstall.
Scheduled.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: