[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1060103: New of imagemagick7



Le mercredi 23 octobre 2024, 12:03:21 UTC Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
Hi,

> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 20/10/2024 11:04, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> > Le jeudi 17 octobre 2024, 20:02:56 UTC Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues a écrit :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Tue, 24 Sep 2024 12:58:48 +0000 Bastien =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roucari=E8s?= <rouca@debian.org> wrote:
> >>> Le mardi 20 août 2024, 07:11:13 UTC Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> >>>> On 28/07/2024 20:56, Bastien Roucariès wrote:
> >>>>> control: tags -1 - moreinfo
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Last reverse deps of lib magick pipeline is not really bad
> >>>>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/pipelines/708187
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A lot of failure are due to broken package or does not use pkgconfig
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I suppose we could go to experimental
> >>>>
> >>>> Yes, uploading to experimental would be the first step, as I said on my previous
> >>>> email. Then we would need bug reports for packages that fail to build against
> >>>> imagemagick 7. Make those bugs block this one and use some usertag to ease tracking.
> >>>>
> >>>> If you want this to be done for trixie, we need to move fast.
> >>>
> >>> Could we began with transition ?
> >>>
> >>> I have fixed a few package and I think it is ok.
> >>>
> >>> I am working with java team to fix jamagick
> >>
> >> to support Bastien's request, I created a wiki page as an overview of the
> >> current status:
> >>
> >> https://wiki.debian.org/ImageMagick7
> >>
> >> This page includes those source packages which FTBFS in the salsa-ci pipeline
> >> that Bastien set up to test reverse dependencies of imagemagick:
> >>
> >> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/pipelines/746158/builds
> 
> Nice pipeline, and thanks for the wiki page.
> 
> >> Most of the remaining failures are packages which FTBFS for other reasons than
> >> imagemagick 7. I have linked the respective FTBFS bugs behind the "other FTBFS"
> >> links. The remaining packages fall into either of the following categories:
> >>
> >>   - not in main
> >>   - popcon below 10
> >>   - has a bug filed blocking this bug
> >>   - dune-* (i believe those are false positives as i cannot reproduce them
> >>     locally)
> >>
> >> There are only two exceptions with which I need Bastien's help:
> >>
> >>   - src:dx has not seen a new upstream release in 16 years and can be built
> >>     without imagemagick by running ./configure --without-magick
> > Fixed in last salsa
> >>   - src:digikam FTBFS with "MagickCore/magick-config.h:25:10: fatal error:
> >>     MagickCore/magick-baseconfig.h: No such file or directory" -- is that a
> >>     missing dependency of src:digikam on libmagickcore-dev (which pulls in
> >>     libmagickcore-7-arch-config) or should libmagick++-dev gain a dependency on
> >>     libmagickcore-dev?
> > 
> > fixed in last salsa
> > 
> > 
> >>
> >> Should I be looking into the FTBFS issues in contrib and non-free as well?
> >>
> >> Bastien, I also created a MR against imagemagick's salsa repo which refactors
> >> your rdep building construct, turning it from a manual selection of rdeps into
> >> an automatic computation using build-rdeps from devscripts. You can have a look
> >> if you like but it needs a bit more work and unfortunately, salsa does still
> >> seem to be stuck, so my work on that is stalled:
> >>
> >> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/imagemagick/-/merge_requests/1
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> 
> Things are looking good. Let's go ahead.

Go ahead two day ago forget to mention here
> 
> Cheers,
> Emilio
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: