[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1080952: marked as done (transition: ghc-9.6.6)

Your message dated Sat, 19 Oct 2024 13:43:31 +0200
with message-id <ZxObYz1P5UYdvC-r@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1080952: transition: ghc-9.6.6
has caused the Debian Bug report #1080952,
regarding transition: ghc-9.6.6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1080952: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080952
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ghc@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ghc
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear release team,

We (the Debian Haskell team) would like to start the transition to
update GHC to version 9.6.6. GHC has already been updated/tested in
experimental and seems to work.

As part of this transition, we need to update ~350 packages to a newer
version, and do a sourceful upload for the rest of the Haskell libraries
(~1000 packages).


Ben file:

title = "ghc-9.6.6";
is_affected = .source ~ "ghc" | .build-depends ~ "ghc" | .build-depends ~ "haskell-devscripts" | .depends ~ "libghc-" ;
is_good = !.uninstallable ~ "yes";
is_bad = .uninstallable ~ "yes";


Thank you,

-- 
Ilias

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2024-09-08 18:07:59 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 = confirimed
> 
> On 2024-09-08 13:35:13 +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 08, 2024 at 11:39AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > Currently haskell-libxml-sax has
> > > no reverse dependencies in testing and could be removed. Can you confirm
> > > that this is also the case after the transition so that nothing would
> > > get stuck if we would have to remove haskell-libxml-sax?
> > 
> > I confirm that haskell-libxml-sax is obsolete and can be removed. In
> > fact, I have just requested for it to be removed:
> > 
> >   https://bugs.debian.org/1081129
> > 
> > Thanks for flagging this, one less package to worry about.
> 
> Thanks, please go ahead with the new ghc version.

ghc migrated, thanks!

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: