Bug#1085017: marked as done (nmu: libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2)
Your message dated Wed, 16 Oct 2024 11:23:05 +0200
with message-id <fe56f728-eb19-4994-9afb-b547bd8f7b00@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1085017: nmu: libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1085017,
regarding nmu: libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1085017: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1085017
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: libxxf86vm@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + libxxf86vm1
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
User: debian-cross@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
Hi release team
libxxf86vm1 has a different changelog.Debian.gz for riscv64 vs any other
architecture. This causes an unpack error from dpkg. Please binNMU on
all architectures.
nmu libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild to fix coinstallation failure"
Helmut
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 13/10/2024 10:01, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: libxxf86vm@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + libxxf86vm1
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
User: debian-cross@lists.debian.org
Usertags: ftcbfs
Hi release team
libxxf86vm1 has a different changelog.Debian.gz for riscv64 vs any other
architecture. This causes an unpack error from dpkg. Please binNMU on
all architectures.
nmu libxxf86vm_1:1.1.4-1+b2 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild to fix coinstallation failure"
Already scheduled as part of #1085052.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: