[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1085052: nmu: many packages for riscv64 coinstallation



On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 05:50:48PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> the changlog.Debian.gz being different for riscv64 seems to be a more
> common issue than I thought and fixing them individually, feels like a
> waste of time to me now. Can we just binNMU them all in one batch?

do we know how this happened and whether this will not happen again?
 
> The multiarch hinter has knowledge of the cases. We can extract the
> cases where the changelog.Debian.gz is different for riscv64 vs everyone
> else using a yq query:
> 
> curl -s https://dedup.debian.net/static/multiarch-hints.yaml.xz | xzcat | yq -r '.hints|map(select(.link=="https://wiki.debian.org/MultiArch/Hints#file-conflict";))|map(select(.description|contains("/changelog.Debian.gz on riscv64 <->")))|map(.source+"_"+.version)|unique|join("\n")'
 
I wonder if this should be turned into a (jenkins) job like
https://jenkins.debian.net/job/udd_trixie_multiarch_versionskew/72/console
or https://jenkins.debian.net/job/udd_sid_multiarch_versionskew/3536/console


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

"tja" - a German reaction to the apocalypse, dawn of the gods, nuclear war,
an alien attack or no bread in the house.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: