Bug#1079981: marked as done (transition: inchi)
Your message dated Sat, 14 Sep 2024 10:00:08 +0200
with message-id <ZuVCiErJ6RD-3ClP@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1079981: transition: inchi
has caused the Debian Bug report #1079981,
regarding transition: inchi
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1079981: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1079981
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to request a transition slot for inchi
(experimental -> unstable) due to soname bump. Current ben tracker [1]
is OK. Rebuild results for reverse dependencies:
* jni-inchi: needs a patch from [2]
* openbabel: OK
Thanks,
Andrius
[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-inchi.html
[2]
https://salsa.debian.org/debichem-team/jni-inchi/-/raw/inchi-v1.07.1/debian/patches/inchi-v1.07.1.patch
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-09-11 08:53:23 +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On 2024-09-08 22:10, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2024-09-08 14:21:57 +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> > > inchi has migrated to testing and all its binary reverse dependencies seem
> > > to have switched from libinchi1 to libinchi1.07. However, transition tracker
> > > [1] shows the reverse dependencies as partially migrated - what could be the
> > > issue with them?
> >
> > The tracker shows that they have partially been rebuilt. That is, the
> > packages match both good and bad expression. That is an
> > issue of the auto-generated tracker which fails if the bad package name
> > is a prefix of the good package name. The current status of the
> > transition is that we need to to wait for jni-inchi, openbabel and rdkit
> > to migrate.
>
> Thanks for explanation. Now all the aforementioned packages have migrated
> and the transition tracker seems to be no longer available, can the
> transition bug be closed?
Yes, it can. Closing it now.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: