Bug#1064810: transition: mpi-defaults

[Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>]

On 2024-07-13 10:54:19 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> 
> On 12/07/2024 22:56, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2024-07-08 11:40:37 +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > > On 08/07/2024 11:34, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > Hi Alastair
> > > > 
> > > > On 2024-07-07 19:20:01 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > > > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > > > > 
> > > > > On 2024-02-26 06:40:41 +0000, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > > > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > > > Severity: normal
> > > > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > > > Usertags: transition
> > > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: mpi-defaults@packages.debian.org, debian-science@lists.debian.org
> > > > > > Control: affects -1 + src:mpi-defaults
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > OpenMPI 5.0 drops 32-bit support, so we need to move those archs to MPICH.
> > > > > Let's go ahead with this change. Please switch the 32 bit architectures
> > > > > to mpich.
> > > > Thanks for the upload of mpi-defaults. A fix for #1028172 is needed
> > > > though to continue with this transition. I would appreciate if you could
> > > > take a look at that bug.
> > > > 
> > > Thanks for highlighting it. I'm preparing a fix now.
> > Most of the binNMUs are now scheduled. Not that
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/mpi-defaults.html still
> > lists quite a lot of packages. Some FTBFS, but others also depend on
> > both mpi-defaults and openmpi and build with openmpi. I would appreciate
> > if you could take a look at those packages and file bugs where
> > appropriate.
> > 
> > Cheers
> 
> Will do.  Thanks

Let's also start the openmpi 32 bit removal transition. The tracker is
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/openmpi-rm32.html.

Same request as above: please check the packages that are marked as bad
on the tracker and file bugs to change to mpich or drop the 32 bit
binaries as appropriate.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher