Bug#1030771: nmu: x11vnc_0.9.16-7
On Wed, 2023-04-19 at 18:09 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Tue, 2023-02-07 at 12:14 +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > after upload of libvncserver: 0.9.13+dfsg-2+deb11u1 our users
> > spotted
> > a
> > regression in performance of x11vnc. The solutions for the
> > reporting users were:
> >
> > (1) downgrade to libvncserver 0.9.13+dfsg-2
> > (2) rebuild x11vnc against libvncserver 0.9.13+dfsg-2+deb11u1
> >
> > Option (2) is IMHO the way to go, thus this binNMU request for
> > x11vnc in Debian bullseye.
> >
> > The ABI-break patch in libvncserver is this:
> > https://salsa.debian.org/debian-remote-team/libvncserver/-/blob/debian/bullseye/updates/debian/patches/0003-rfb-increase-update-buf-size.patch
>
> Given that this is apparently an ABI break, and libvncserver has
> several other reverse (build-)dependencies in stable, how confident
> are you that x11vnc is the only affected package?
Ping on this, given that bullseye is now oldstable and about to have
its final point release.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: