[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1078537: marked as done (unblock: libreoffice/4:24.2.5-3)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Aug 2024 20:59:25 +0200
with message-id <7c4cf6f7-53ed-4cd1-9866-26c798320e0d@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1078537: unblock: libreoffice/4:24.2.5-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1078537,
regarding unblock: libreoffice/4:24.2.5-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1078537: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078537
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: Deiban Korean L10N <debian-l10n-korean@lists.debian.org>, Debian Accessibility Team <pkg-a11y-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net>
Control: affects -1 + src:libreoffice

Hi,

Please hint package libreoffice in (unblock is strictly speaking wrong
here, but...)

This is blocked by autopkgtests:

    ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for h2orestart/0.6.6-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armel: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Failed (not a regression), i386: Pass, ppc64el: Failed (not a regression)
    ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for libreoffice/4:24.2.5-3: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armel: Test in progress (will not be considered a regression), armhf: Test in progress, i386: Test in progress (will not be considered a regression), ppc64el: Test in progress (will not be considered a regression)
    ∙ ∙ autopkgtest for natbraille/2.0rc3-15: amd64: No tests, superficial or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), arm64: No tests, superficial or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), armel: Regression or new test ♻ (reference ♻), armhf: Failed (not a regression), i386: No tests, superficial or marked flaky ♻ (reference ♻), ppc64el: Failed (not a regression)

(cf. https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=libreoffice)

-2 and -3 fix two (unreported) FTBFS with gcc 14 (-2) and openjdk-21 (I
assume) as default (-3). Whereas the openjdk 21 is a testsuite failure
("exception occurred: Could not create Java implementation loader at
./stoc/source/javaloader/javaloader.cxx:551") and thus I simply disabled
Java there too.

This is for armel only. And s390x, ppc64el, armhf has it already so now
armel also is consistent with armhf.

The autopkgtests of h2orestart and natbraille (Both arch: all) is there
since Java support in armel is gone now (as said as before for armhf
etc) and this was hinted in alreday for those.

I hope I got the syntax right, no idea whether that is correct for tests
in other packages affected by libreoffice. Adapt as needed, please :)

force-badtest libreoffice/4:24.2.5-3/armel

Regards,

Rene

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 12-08-2024 07:10, Rene Engelhard wrote:

I hope I got the syntax right, no idea whether that is correct for tests
in other packages affected by libreoffice. Adapt as needed, please :)

force-badtest libreoffice/4:24.2.5-3/armel


close.
# the following ignores all regressions currently seen on the tracker page for libreoffice 
force-skiptest libreoffice/4:24.2.5-3
# the following would ignore the specific failures, but work for other
# packages that try to migrate too, if any
force-badtest natbraille/2.0rc3-15/armel
force-badtest h2orestart/0.6.6-1/armel

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: