Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie

To: Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>, Matthew Vernon <matthew@debian.org>, 1071970@bugs.debian.org
Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie
From: Bastian Germann <bastian.germann@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 21:59:35 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] f658a271-f0f7-4449-9a39-0b8ddadba796@gmx.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] ZrJoA1E7-dKW2gma@per>
References: <20240209152327.GA1251969@subdivi.de> <trinity-f0e643ab-5604-48bb-8cf8-a08cbc14a780-1722931870526@3c-app-gmx-bs31> <20240209152327.GA1251969@subdivi.de> <7b3c72ac-48f0-4a3f-8d7e-9636a0f5d579@debian.org> <[🔎] ZrJoA1E7-dKW2gma@per>

Control: tags -1 d-i

Am 06.08.24 um 20:14 schrieb Chris Hofstaedtler:

libpcre3-udeb is indeed considered Priority: important and thus key.

I'm sure release team will be happy to assist with the removal once
cfengine3 has migrated.


Thanks for the hint. Is there any reverse dependency in the installer that needs libpcre3-udeb?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie
  - From: Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>

References:
- Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie
  - From: Chris Hofstaedtler <zeha@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie
Next by Date: Bug#1078095: libeccodes-tools: please drop ksh and alternatives
Previous by thread: Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie
Next by thread: Re: Bug#1071970: pcre3 should not be part of trixie
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread