Bug#1060188: transition: flatbuffers
On Sun, 2024-01-21 at 16:54 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> Should those that are not part of the transition tracker use the
> shared
> library or not?
No.
In order to make this simpler, I notified all reverse dependencies
to rebuild against the latest flatbuffers, and marked the bugs
as affects src:flatbuffers.
armnn [OK] Bug#1076173
buildbot [OK] Bug#1076174
facet-analyser [not in testing; FTBFS already]
gnome-keysign [OK] Bug#1076175
kodi [OK] Bug#1076176
libsigmf [OK] Bug#1076177
magic-wormhole [OK] Bug#1076178
magic-wormhole-mailbox-server [FTBFS already; irrelevant, #1058173]
paraview [OK] Bug#1076179
python-autobahn [OK] Bug#1076180
python-daphne [OK] Bug#1076181
python-django-channels [OK] Bug#1076182
pytorch [OK] Bug#1076183
starlette [OK] Bug#1076184
vast [not in testing; FTBFS already]
zaqar [OK] Bug#1076185
zlmdb [OK] Bug#1076186
Shall we proceed and upload to unstable?
Reply to: