Bug#1054915: bookworm-pu: package freerdp2/2.11.2+dfsg1-1~deb12u1
- To: Tobias Frost <tobi@debian.org>
- Cc: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>, 1054915@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#1054915: bookworm-pu: package freerdp2/2.11.2+dfsg1-1~deb12u1
- From: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 20:46:39 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] ZnccDw1szMD0EgnZ@eldamar.lan>
- Reply-to: Salvatore Bonaccorso <carnil@debian.org>, 1054915@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <ZdWtqh-1jn1Pwm80@powdarrmonkey.net>
- References: <169850871879.950712.12455347174452386692.reportbug@isildor2.loewenhoehle.ip> <169850871879.950712.12455347174452386692.reportbug@isildor2.loewenhoehle.ip> <ZdWtqh-1jn1Pwm80@powdarrmonkey.net> <169850871879.950712.12455347174452386692.reportbug@isildor2.loewenhoehle.ip>
Hi Tobi,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:00:42AM +0000, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Control: tag -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 05:58:38PM +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Backporting the fixes is of course possible, but bears a significant
> > risk for regression, therefor I would prefer to use the new upstream
> > version, given also that upstream changes are only a few and fixing
> > also a few bugs that would be nice to be fixed.
>
> It's a balancing act, as always. I'm OK with new upstream releases if they
> are small enough to sensibly review (or an upstream with a good trusted
> history, which I don't yet have for freerdp2). If you think a new upstream
> is reasonable, let's see how it looks.
>
> Either way we need a source debdiff please.
Did you saw the followup question from Jonathan?
Regards,
Salvatore
Reply to: