Bug#1072036: release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.8 / libgsl28
On 21 June 2024 at 05:34, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 21 June 2024 at 10:43, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
| | Control: tags -1 moreinfo
| |
| | On 2024-05-27 12:01:45 -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| | >
| | > Package: release.debian.org
| | > Severity: normal
| | > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
| | > Usertags: transition
| | >
| | > GNU GSL 2.8 was released a few days ago, and I uploaded a new version to
| | > experimental was has now cleared NEW.
| | >
| | > I checked my email folder, and the last time this happened (gsl 2.7, early
| | > 2021) we attempted an automatic transition but some things got in the way it
| | > seems. Help from Graham (CC'ed) was invaluable then,
| | >
| | > I am easy either way: a formal or automatic transition works for me, so
| | > please advise as to what you preferred course of action is. The package has a
| | > fair number of reverse dependencies but rebuilds "should" work cleanly.
| |
| | Did you perform test builds of the reverse dependencies?
|
| Mo, how wow I trigger this?
Ok, now with more coffee and after an early morning bike ride:
"No, how would I trigger this?" Happy to help but will need a hint.
Dirk
| | If so, have bugs been filed for those failing to build?
|
| See above.
|
| Dirk
|
| |
| | Cheers
| | --
| | Sebastian Ramacher
|
| --
| dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org
--
dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org
Reply to: