[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1071614: marked as done (transition: libmatio13)

Your message dated Fri, 14 Jun 2024 16:08:39 +0200
with message-id <ZmxO5zKYAB1Q4yBD@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1071614: transition: libmatio13
has caused the Debian Bug report #1071614,
regarding transition: libmatio13
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1071614: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071614
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: libmatio@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libmatio
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libmatio.html

Dear Release Team,

Please schedule a transition for libmatio.

I’ve successfully rebuilt all reverse dependencies against the new version
(currently in experimental), except gnss-sdr and labplot which are currently
unbuildable due to the qt5 transition.

Thanks,

--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  https://www.debian.org

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2024-05-31 15:23:14 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> Le vendredi 31 mai 2024 à 12:43 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> > On 31/05/2024 12:19, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > Le vendredi 31 mai 2024 à 09:31 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit :
> > > > On 24/05/2024 19:34, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > > > > On 22/05/2024 14:49, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > > > Severity: normal
> > > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: libmatio@packages.debian.org
> > > > > > Control: affects -1 + src:libmatio
> > > > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > > > Usertags: transition
> > > > > > Control: forwarded -1
> > > > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libmatio.html
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Dear Release Team,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Please schedule a transition for libmatio.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I’ve successfully rebuilt all reverse dependencies against the new version
> > > > > > (currently in experimental), except gnss-sdr and labplot which are currently
> > > > > > unbuildable due to the qt5 transition.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Let's wait for the Qt 5 transition then.
> > > > 
> > > > The Qt 5 transition is over now, so assuming those two packages build against
> > > > libmatio13, then go ahead with this.
> > > 
> > > It turns out that labplot FTBFS against the new libmatio. I opened a
> > > bug and submitted a patch that fixes the issue.
> > > 
> > > Should I upload libmatio to unstable now and then NMU labplot, or
> > > should I give some time to the labplot maintainer to react?
> > 
> > Either way is fine. You can start the transition now as I believe libmatio can 
> > be smooth-updated, so we don't really have to block on labplot. Of course fixing 
> > it later if the maintainer doesn't would be good in order to complete the 
> > transition.
> 
> Thanks. I just uploaded the new libmatio to unstable.

The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: