[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1070698: marked as done (transition: ticcutils)

Your message dated Sun, 2 Jun 2024 13:12:03 +0200
with message-id <ZlxTgxhwaIdrX03z@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1070698: transition: ticcutils
has caused the Debian Bug report #1070698,
regarding transition: ticcutils
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1070698: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070698
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: ticcutils@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ticcutils
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ticcutils.html
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
I am requesting a transition slot for ticcutils. The experimental version builds libticcutils9 while the unstable version has libticcutils8t64. The referenced tracker is okay. All reverse dependencies build with the experimental version (where an experimental version exists, it is the one that builds with libticcutils9).
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2024-05-07 15:42:11 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 07/05/2024 14:21, Bastian Germann wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: ticcutils@packages.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:ticcutils
> > Control: forwarded -1
> > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ticcutils.html
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > I am requesting a transition slot for ticcutils. The experimental
> > version builds libticcutils9 while the unstable version has
> > libticcutils8t64. The referenced tracker is okay. All reverse
> > dependencies build with the experimental version (where an experimental
> > version exists, it is the one that builds with libticcutils9).
> 
> Go ahead.

The old binaries got removed from testing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: