Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2024 09:08:22 +0300 with message-id <ZllpVvrkGktSGq5r@mitya57.me> and subject line Re: Bug#1061179: transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-13 has caused the Debian Bug report #1061179, regarding transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-13 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1061179: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061179 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-12
- From: Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 13:47:18 +0300
- Message-id: <Zauktt8blzLhJmz2@mitya57.me>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Control: block -1 by 1060761 1060802 Dear Release team, I have skipped Qt 5.15.11 release and would like to upgrade to 5.15.12 which was published in December. Qt WebEngine will be upgraded from 5.15.15 to 5.15.16. The transition is prepared in experimental. There are two blockers, lomiri-ui-toolkit and stellarium, but I can NMU them. I have submitted a merge request with the ben file: https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/transition-data/-/merge_requests/47 -- Dmitry ShachnevAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 1061179-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1061179: transition: qtbase-abi-5-15-13
- From: Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 09:08:22 +0300
- Message-id: <ZllpVvrkGktSGq5r@mitya57.me>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] b7198d44-0a2b-43ef-8012-c7a6a6e3baa0@debian.org>
- References: <Zauktt8blzLhJmz2@mitya57.me> <[🔎] CAD+GYvxHbcXpB0m7ELLT2nNV-bex6iHmS=h8wADD_9xvUtQDDA@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] Zktq3h4xqW919tFz@mitya57.me> <Zauktt8blzLhJmz2@mitya57.me> <[🔎] ZkuQkt8cE2fm7sto@ramacher.at> <Zauktt8blzLhJmz2@mitya57.me> <[🔎] ZlC9ZNwTrPyec-y5@mitya57.me> <Zauktt8blzLhJmz2@mitya57.me> <[🔎] b7198d44-0a2b-43ef-8012-c7a6a6e3baa0@debian.org>
On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 07:30:40PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > btw not sure what to do about qtbase-opensource-src's reverse > autopkgtests[1]. Looks like they are having some trouble installing the > right dependencies from unstable. Perhaps they hadn't been rebuilt yet when > the tests were scheduled. Paul, do you have any ideas? And it migrated! \o/ Thanks to Paul for helping me with retrying tests. -- Dmitry ShachnevAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---