On 24/05/2024 11:02, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 5/24/24 9:30 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:If that's the case, gdal should probably break older versions of libgdal-grass so that that combination is not possible. That will also make britney happy, otherwise it will block gdal due to the test regression.gdal, grass, and libgdal-grass just need to be tested together. I'd rather drop the autopkgtest test than having to maintain the Breaks in gdal.
*shrug*. If that's a runtime check, then there's an issue with the dependencies/breaks, as one could have old libgdal-grass with newer gdal (as is happening in the autopkgtest) and then libgdal-grass is broken.
If it's a check that's being done in libgdal-grass, then maybe that check can be dropped?
With the information that autopkgtest has, the current situation is broken and testing migration will be (rightly) blocked.
Cheers, Emilio