[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1061267: marked as done (transition: unixcw)



Your message dated Mon, 13 May 2024 20:27:32 +0200
with message-id <ZkJblGCB5DiATNpk@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1061267: transition: unixcw
has caused the Debian Bug report #1061267,
regarding transition: unixcw
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1061267: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1061267
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: unixcw@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:unixcw

Dear Release Team,

I am requesting a transition for unixcw [1].  The one reverse
dependency, cwdaemon, builds correctly against the package in
experimental.  The auto-transition page is [2].

Thank you,
tony

[1] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/unixcw
[2] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-unixcw.html

Ben file:

title = "unixcw";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libcw7" | .depends ~ "libcw8";
is_good = .depends ~ "libcw8";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libcw7";

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-05-05 18:31:20 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 2024-01-21 11:21:03 -0800, tony mancill wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: unixcw@packages.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:unixcw
> > 
> > Dear Release Team,
> > 
> > I am requesting a transition for unixcw [1].  The one reverse
> > dependency, cwdaemon, builds correctly against the package in
> > experimental.  The auto-transition page is [2].
> 
> Please go ahead.

The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply to: